Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta propiedad intelectual. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta propiedad intelectual. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 18 de enero de 2012

El apagón de Wikipedia y los derechos de propiedad intelectual



Nuevamente la pregunta: ¿a quién sirven los derechos de propiedad intelectual? Wikipedia deja claro que una cosa es la circulación libre de la información y el conocimiento, y otra la piratería con fines comerciales. Relacionando esto con el tema de nuestra lengua española, sí es piratería toda la iniciativa de la Marca España, es piratería contra todos los hablantes. Como la lengua, el conocimiento se construye colectivamente y nos pertenece a todos.

Acá la explicación y enlaces correspondientes sobre el apagón de Wikipedia y las iniciativas legislativas contra las que protesta.

Why is Wikipedia blacked-out?
Wikipedia is protesting against SOPA and PIPA by blacking out the English Wikipedia for 24 hours, beginning at midnight January 18, Eastern Time. Readers who come to English Wikipedia during the blackout will not be able to read the encyclopedia. Instead, you will see messages intended to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA, encouraging you to share your views with your representatives, and with each other on social media.
What are SOPA and PIPA?
SOPA and PIPA represent two bills in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate respectively. SOPA is short for the "Stop Online Piracy Act," and PIPA is an acronym for the "Protect IP Act." ("IP" stands for "intellectual property.") In short, these bills are efforts to stop copyright infringement committed by foreign web sites, but, in our opinion, they do so in a way that actually infringes free expression while harming the Internet. Detailed information about these bills can be found in the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act articles on Wikipedia, which are available during the blackout. GovTrack lets you follow both bills through the legislative process: SOPA on this page, and PIPA on this one. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for the public interest in the digital realm, has summarized why these bills are simply unacceptable in a world that values an open, secure, and free Internet.
Why is the blackout happening?
Wikipedians have chosen to black out the English Wikipedia for the first time ever, because we are concerned that SOPA and PIPA will severely inhibit people's access to online information. This is not a problem that will solely affect people in the United States: it will affect everyone around the world.
Why? SOPA and PIPA are badly drafted legislation that won't be effective at their stated goal (to stop copyright infringement), and will cause serious damage to the free and open Internet. They put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. And, SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression.
Does this mean that Wikipedia itself is violating copyright laws, or hosting pirated content?
No, not at all. Some supporters of SOPA and PIPA characterize everyone who opposes them as cavalier about copyright, but that is not accurate. Wikipedians are knowledgeable about copyright and vigilant in protecting against violations: Wikipedians spend thousands of hours every week reviewing and removing infringing content. We are careful about it because our mission is to share knowledge freely. To that end, all Wikipedians release their contributions under a free license, and all the material we offer is freely licensed. Free licenses are incompatible with copyright infringement, and so infringement is not tolerated.
Isn't SOPA dead? Wasn't the bill shelved, and didn't the White House declare that it won't sign anything that resembles the current bill?
No, neither SOPA nor PIPA is dead. On January 17th, SOPA's sponsor said the bill will be discussed in early February. There are signs PIPA may be debated on the Senate floor next week. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. In many jurisdictions around the world, we're seeing the development of legislation that prioritizes overly-broad copyright enforcement laws, laws promoted by power players, over the preservation of individual civil liberties.
How could SOPA and PIPA hurt Wikipedia?
SOPA and PIPA are a threat to Wikipedia in many ways. For example, in its current form, SOPA would require Wikipedia to actively monitor every site we link to, to ensure it doesn't host infringing content. Any link to an infringing site could put us in jeopardy of being forced offline.
I live in the United States. What's the best way for me to help?
The most effective action you can take is to call your representatives and tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. Type your zipcode in the locator box to find your representatives' contact information. Text-based communication is okay, but phone calls have the most impact.
I don't live in the United States. How can I help?
Contact your local State Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, or similar branch of government. Tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. SOPA and PIPA will affect sites outside of the United States, and actions to sites inside the United States (like Wikipedia) will also affect non-American readers -- like you. Calling your own government will also let them know you don't want them to create their own bad anti-Internet legislation.
Is it still possible to access Wikipedia in any way?
Yes. During the blackout, Wikipedia is accessible on mobile devices and smart phones. You can also view Wikipedia normally by disabling JavaScript in your browser, as explained on this Technical FAQ page. Our purpose here isn't to make it completely impossible for people to read Wikipedia, and it's okay for you to circumvent the blackout. We just want to make sure you see our message.
I keep hearing that this is a fight between Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Is that true?
No. Some people are characterizing it that way, probably in an effort to imply all the participants are motivated by commercial self-interest. But it's obviously not that simple. The proof of that is Wikipedia's involvement. Wikipedia has no financial self-interest at play here: we do not benefit from copyright infringement, nor are we trying to monetize traffic or sell ads. We are protesting to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA solely because we think they will hurt the Internet, and your ability to access information online. We are doing this for you, because we're on your side.
In carrying out this protest, is Wikipedia abandoning neutrality?
We hope you continue to trust Wikipedia to be a neutral information source. We are staging this blackout because (as Wikimedia Foundation Trustee Kat Walsh said recently), although Wikipedia’s articles are neutral, its existence is not. For over a decade, Wikipedians have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Wikipedia is a tremendously useful resource, and its existence depends upon a free, open and uncensored Internet. SOPA and PIPA (and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States) will hurt you, because they will make it impossible for sites you enjoy, and benefit from, to continue to exist. That's why we're doing this.
I have a question that isn't answered here, or, I would like to send feedback to Wikipedia.
You can reach Wikipedia editors at info-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org. If you need a response, please be patient: we may have trouble keeping up with the mail.

What can I read to get more information?
Try these links:
As of 6AM PT, January 18, Google has more than 4,600 articles about the blackout. Here are a few:

domingo, 18 de diciembre de 2011

¿A quién sirven las leyes de propiedad intelectual?


El senado mexicano acaba de aprobar una serie de medidas legislativas que le dan mayor autoridad judicial al Instituto Mexicano de Propiedad Industrial (IMPI), muy en sintonía con las medidas del legislativo mexicano de los últimos años, que dan autoridad policiaca y carta blanca judicial a instancias corruptas. Todos sabemos al servicio de qué intereses van a usar sus nuevos poderes. ¿Cómo se cruza este asunto con la vida profesional de los traductores? Si miramos las nuevas medidas mexicanas a trasluz de lo que está ocurriendo internacionalmente con la industria editorial y la lengua española, se dibuja el perfil de un ejército compacto e implacable. Los detalles de estas nuevas medidas y sus implicaciones están en un artículo de Geraldine Juárez, acá un extracto y el enlace:

Senado Mexicano se postra a los pies de la industria del copyright
Geraldine Juárez
Alt1040 en Rebelión

[...]

La mayoría de los senadores involucrados en el Grupo Plural de Trabajo de ACTA coincidieron en que el principal problema de la tendencia actual de las leyes de propiedad intelectual son su capacidad para violentar los derechos humanos, perturbar las comunicaciones privadas, vulnerar la privacidad, omitir el debido proceso y presunción de inocencia, los dos últimos fundamentales para el ejercicio y aplicación de la justicia.

Pero los legisladores mexicanos, famosos por su corrupción y manipulación de la ley para proteger sus intereses partidistas y los de los lobbys que los apoyan, aplicaron el día de ayer lo que se conoce como el “albazo” — la práctica legislativa de aprobar leyes en “fast-track” y sin supervisión alguna. Estas legislaciones tienen como regla general el afectar negativamente a la sociedad y tienen elementos inconstitucionales, por tanto no son discutidas públicamente antes de ser votadas. Legislación oscura, como también lo son todas las leyes de propiedad intelectual de este siglo.

El miércoles, la iniciativa #IMPIPolicial del Senador Rogelio Rueda del PRI fue aprobada con 58 votos a favor y solo 10 en contra. Antes que nada, el IMPI ya tiene la mayoría de las atribuciones que esta iniciativa menciona, hace visitas para ver “¿Qué traes en tu sistema?” y no son secreto los acuerdos para colaborar que ha firmado con la BSA desde hace tiempo. Lo que aquí cambia es la capacidad que se la da esta autoridad — en la cual muchos ciudadanos no confían en lo más mínimo— para grabar las diligencias y utilizar el material de foto y vídeo que recopilen como evidencia de valor probatorio.

[...]

La iniciativa que le da a una institución que ha probado su opacidad y su servilismo a los monopolios intelectuales, valora la intencionalidad de la infracción, pero esto desgraciadamente no deja un lado el despropósito para el bien común que caracteriza a esta institución."

Aquí el artículo completo:

La resolución a que se refiere el artículo está en:
Senado de la República, LXI Legislatura, 8 de diciembre de 2011

Para muestra, un botón:

"Dictámenes de Primera Lectura
De las Comisiones Unidas de Comercio y Fomento Industrial y de Estudios Legislativos, el que contiene proyecto de decreto por el que se reforman diversas disposiciones de la Ley de la Propiedad Industrial y el artículo 232 de la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor.

[...]

CONTENIDO DE LA MINUTA:
La minuta aprobada por la Cámara de Diputados pretende modificar una serie de disposiciones de la Ley de la Propiedad Industrial con el propósito de dotar al Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial (en adelante IMPI) de las atribuciones suficientes que le permitan ejercer eficazmente las labores de defensa de la propiedad industrial, particularmente en la lucha contra la piratería.

Asimismo, propone reformar el artículo 232 de la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor con el objeto de incrementar el monto máximo de las sanciones aplicables para las infracciones."